Richard Dawkins
Scientist
0 citas
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate evidence. Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence.
People believe the only alternative to randomness is intelligent design.
By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
I suppose if you look back to your early childhood you accept everything people tell you, and that includes a heavy dose of irrationality - you're told about tooth fairies and Father Christmas and things.
The chances of each of us coming into existence are infinitesimally small, and even though we shall all die some day, we should count ourselves fantastically lucky to get our decades in the sun.
Natural selection will not remove ignorance from future generations.
I accept that there may be things far grander and more incomprehensible than we can possibly imagine.
But perhaps the rest of us could have separate classes in science appreciation, the wonder of science, scientific ways of thinking, and the history of scientific ideas, rather than laboratory experience.
It's a horrible idea that God, this paragon of wisdom and knowledge, power, couldn't think of a better way to forgive us our sins than to come down to Earth in his alter ego as his son and have himself hideously tortured and executed so that he could forgive himself.
The psychologist Elizabeth Loftus has shown great courage, in the face of spiteful vested interests, in demonstrating how easy it is for people to concoct memories that are entirely false but which seem, to the victim, every bit as real as true memories.
Although many of us fear death, I think there is something illogical about it.
Design can never be an ultimate explanation for anything. It can only be a proximate explanation. A plane or a car is explained by a designer but that's because the designer himself, the engineer, is explained by natural selection.
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.
Of course, we would love to know more about the exact moment of Big Bang, but interposing an outside intelligence does nothing to add to that knowledge, as we still know nothing about the creation of that intelligence.
I detest 'Jingle Bells,' 'White Christmas,' 'Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer,' and the obscene spending bonanza that nowadays seems to occupy not just December, but November and much of October, too.
If something is true, no amount of wishful thinking will change it.
The reason we personify things like cars and computers is that just as monkeys live in an arboreal world and moles live in an underground world and water striders live in a surface tension-dominated flatland, we live in a social world.
Personally, I rather look forward to a computer program winning the world chess championship. Humanity needs a lesson in humility.
We are a unique ape. We have language. Other animals have systems of communication that fall far short of that. They don't have the same ability to communicate complicated conditionals and what-ifs and talk about things that are not present.
I think the written word is probably the best medium of communication because you have time to reflect, you have time to choose your words, to get your sentences exactly right. Whereas when you're being interviewed, say, you have to talk on the fly, you have to improvise, you can change sentences around, and they're not exactly right.
We are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.
Sigue explorando
Explorar temas
- Leadership(93)
- Home(92)
- Communication(90)
- Intelligence(86)
- Family(82)
- Dad(81)
- Experience(72)
- Faith(61)
- Forgiveness(38)
- Attitude(34)
- Education(32)
- Courage(28)
Aviso Legal del Contenido
Las citas publicadas en esta biblioteca se presentan únicamente con fines inspiracionales y educativos. Reflejan los puntos de vista y experiencias personales de sus autores en el momento en que fueron pronunciadas o escritas, y no representan necesariamente las posiciones, estrategias u opiniones de Kids on the Yard.
Presentar a un autor o una cita no constituye un respaldo a la totalidad de su obra, filosofía, creencias religiosas o políticas, conducta profesional o afiliaciones personales. Animamos a los lectores a investigar a los autores de forma independiente y formar sus propias conclusiones.
Ninguna cita debe interpretarse como una recomendación a favor o en contra de ningún tratamiento médico, terapia, vacuna, medicamento, currículo, método de crianza o enfoque educativo específico. Las decisiones sobre salud y aprendizaje siempre deben tomarse en consulta con un profesional calificado que conozca a su hijo.
Las filosofías educativas, opiniones de crianza y consejos de vida expresados en las citas son de naturaleza general. Los padres y tutores son los únicos responsables de evaluar qué ideas — si alguna — se aplican a las circunstancias de su familia.
Nada en esta biblioteca constituye asesoramiento legal, financiero, médico, psicológico u otro asesoramiento profesional. Para orientación específica, consulte a un profesional debidamente autorizado.
Kids on the Yard no asume responsabilidad por las acciones tomadas con base en el contenido de cualquier cita o perfil de autor en esta biblioteca.